Key messages 

Policy implications 

Gaps 

Commentary 
This parliamentary inquiry highlights the challenges faced by people living in rural communities when accessing health and social care services. Around 9.7 million people live in rural areas in England, many in small villages and isolated communities where services are more spread out. 

Distance is one of the main barriers. People in rural areas often have to travel further to reach hospitals, GP services or social care support. Public transport options are often limited, meaning access to care may depend on having a car or support from family members. These barriers can be particularly difficult for older people, people with disabilities and unpaid carers. 

Workforce shortages also contribute to care inequities in rural areas. Health and social care providers often find it harder to recruit and retain staff in rural locations. Staff may need to travel long distances between patients, and smaller local services may struggle to maintain stable teams. 

Funding arrangements can reinforce these inequities. Delivering services across large rural areas is often more expensive, but existing funding systems do not always account for these additional costs. As a result, services in rural areas may receive fewer resources relative to the challenges they face. 

Another issue highlighted in the report is that rural disadvantage is often less visible in national statistics. Because poverty and health needs are more dispersed across rural communities, they may not appear clearly in standard deprivation measures. This can make it harder for policymakers to identify where support is needed. 

Overall, the inquiry argues that addressing rural care inequities requires policies that recognise the specific challenges of rural areas. Improvements in funding, workforce support, transport and community-based services are needed to ensure that people living in rural communities can access health and social care on fair terms. 

Key messages 

Policy implications 

Gaps 

Commentary 
This study looks at how access to care homes varies across Wales depending on where people live. The researchers mapped the location of care homes and compared this with the distribution of older people who may need residential care. This helps show whether some areas have better access to care home places than others. 

The results show that care homes are not evenly distributed. More homes tend to be located in urban areas and the post-industrial valleys of south-east Wales. However, these areas also have larger older populations, which means demand for care home places is higher. As a result, the actual availability of places may not be as high as the number of homes suggests. 

Some rural areas appear to have a better balance between the number of places and the number of older residents. However, people in these areas may still face challenges because care homes are further apart and travel distances can be longer. This can make it harder for families to visit relatives and for people to remain close to their communities when they move into residential care. 

The study also highlights how the organisation of the care sector affects access. In Wales, most care homes are run by independent providers rather than local authorities. This means the location of homes is partly shaped by market conditions and business decisions, not just local need. Areas that are less profitable or harder to operate in may therefore have fewer services. 

These patterns matter for care equity. If some communities have fewer nearby care homes, people living there may have fewer choices or may need to move further away from their families and support networks. This can affect wellbeing and continuity of care. 

Overall, the study shows that looking at where services are located, and where people live, can help policymakers understand where gaps in care provision exist. This kind of analysis can support better planning of care home services and help ensure that access to residential care is more evenly distributed across regions.

Key statistics 

Key messages 

Policy implications 

Gaps 

Commentary 

This paper explores the concept of transport poverty and how limited mobility can create wider forms of social disadvantage. Transport poverty occurs when people are unable to reach essential services, employment opportunities or social networks because transport is unavailable, unaffordable or unreliable. 

The authors argue that transport poverty has received relatively little attention from transport policy and engineering compared with other areas of infrastructure planning. As a result, responses to transport disadvantage have often been fragmented and inconsistent. 

Transport barriers can affect many aspects of daily life. People may struggle to reach workplaces, educational opportunities, shops or healthcare services. These challenges can contribute to social isolation and economic disadvantage, particularly for people living on low incomes. 

Transport poverty affects both urban and rural populations. In rural areas, people may face long distances between services and limited public transport. In urban areas, the problem may relate more to the cost of transport or poor connectivity between neighbourhoods and employment centres. 

From a health and social care equity perspective, transport plays an important role in determining whether people can access services. Difficulties travelling to health and social care appointments may delay treatment or prevent people from receiving support. Transport barriers can also affect care workers, who may need to travel long distances to visit people receiving care at home. 

The study highlights the importance of recognising mobility as part of the wider system that supports access to services. Policies that improve public transport availability, affordability and connectivity could help reduce transport-related inequities and improve access to health and social care services. 

Key statistics 

Key messages 

Policy implications 

Gaps  

Commentary 
This study examines mental health emergencies attended by ambulance services in rural England during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ambulance services often act as the first point of contact for people experiencing acute mental health crises, particularly when other services are difficult to access. 

The findings show that people attended by ambulances in rural areas were more likely to present with behavioural disturbance, suicidal thoughts or actions, and anxiety-related crises. These types of emergencies often require specialist mental health support, yet access to such services can be more limited in rural areas. 

Rural ambulance services also face practical challenges that differ from urban settings. Longer travel distances, fewer nearby healthcare facilities and limited availability of specialist services can affect response times and the type of support that can be provided during an emergency. 

During the COVID-19 pandemic, many community and mental health services experienced disruption. As a result, ambulance services often became an important entry point into care for people experiencing acute distress. 

From a health and social care equity perspective, the study highlights how geographical location can shape access to crisis support. People living in rural areas may have fewer options for urgent mental health care and may rely more heavily on emergency services. This can place additional pressure on ambulance services and may delay access to specialist support. 

Overall, the findings suggest that improving access to community mental health services and crisis support in rural areas could reduce reliance on emergency responses and help ensure more equitable access to mental health care.

Key statistics 

Key messages 

Policy implications 

Gaps 

Commentary 

This report examines the health and wellbeing of people living in rural England and highlights the complexity of rural health outcomes. Rural areas cover most of England’s land area but contain a relatively small proportion of the population. Despite this, rural communities play an important role in the national health and social care landscape. 

On average, people living in rural areas experience better overall health outcomes than those living in urban areas. For example, life expectancy tends to be higher and some health indicators appear more favourable. However, these averages can hide important differences within rural communities. 

The report emphasises the presence of “hidden deprivation” in rural areas. Small pockets of poverty and poor health may exist within otherwise affluent rural districts. Because rural populations are smaller and more dispersed, these issues may be less visible in national or regional statistics. 

Rural populations also tend to be older than urban populations. Higher proportions of residents aged 65 and over increase demand for health and social care services, including community support and long-term care. 

Geography plays an important role in shaping access to services. Rural communities often experience longer travel distances to healthcare facilities, fewer public transport options and limited availability of specialised services. These factors can make it more difficult for people to access timely support. 

From a health and social care equity perspective, the report highlights the importance of recognising rural diversity. While some rural areas experience strong health outcomes, others face significant challenges linked to deprivation, ageing populations and limited service access. 

The report argues that local authorities need detailed understanding of their rural populations in order to identify and address these challenges. More granular data and locally tailored policies may help ensure that rural communities receive appropriate support and that hidden inequities in health and wellbeing are addressed. 

Key statistics 

Key messages 

Policy implications 

Gaps 

Commentary 

This study explores the challenges involved in recruiting and retaining staff in adult social care services in England. The social care workforce is large and diverse, yet the sector continues to experience difficulties attracting and retaining staff. 

Low pay and demanding working conditions are commonly cited reasons why people leave social care roles. Care providers must also compete with other sectors such as the NHS, hospitality and retail, which may offer higher wages or more stable working hours. These labour market pressures can make it difficult for social care employers to recruit and retain staff. 

Geography also influences workforce recruitment. In rural areas, care workers often need to travel between people’s homes to provide support. Where public transport is limited, workers may need access to a personal vehicle to take up these roles. This requirement can limit the pool of potential staff and make recruitment more difficult for rural providers. 

The report also highlights the influence of commissioning and funding arrangements. Social care providers often have limited control over service pricing because fees are set through local authority commissioning processes. When funding levels are constrained, providers may struggle to improve pay, invest in training or create more stable working conditions. 

From a health and social care equity perspective, workforce shortages can affect the availability and quality of care services. Areas that face greater recruitment challenges may experience reduced service capacity or higher staff turnover, which can affect continuity of care for people receiving support. 

Overall, the report suggests that improving recruitment and retention will require coordinated action across workforce policy, funding arrangements and labour market conditions. Addressing these issues is important for building a sustainable social care workforce and ensuring equitable access to care services across different regions.