Key statistics

Key messages

Policy implications

Gaps

Commentary
This study highlights inequities in access to palliative care for people living in rural, coastal and low income communities. Fragmented services and limited local capacity make it difficult for families to secure care that meets the needs of the person they support, particularly when home-based care is required.

A lack of clear information about who provides care and what support is available at different stages contributes to confusion and stress for families. From a care equity perspective, this uncertainty creates unequal experiences, with those in resource-limited areas facing greater challenges in navigating services.

The findings also draw attention to the impact on family carers. Emotional and physical strain is intensified by limited respite and low awareness of mental health support, increasing the risk of burnout and unmet need.

The paper points to the potential role of voluntary and community sector organisations in addressing gaps, particularly around emotional support. However, without stronger coordination between NHS and community provision, inequities in access and experience are likely to persist for families in these communities.

Key statistics 

Key messages 

Policy implications 

Gaps 

Commentary 

This study examines the health and care needs of people experiencing homelessness who attend emergency care services in rural and coastal areas of North-East England. It uses routinely collected hospital data from Northumberland and North Tyneside to explore patterns of emergency department use and underlying health conditions. 

The findings show that people experiencing homelessness frequently present to emergency care services with complex and overlapping needs. Substance use, mental health conditions and social problems were among the most common reasons for attendance. Around one third of visits involved multiple diagnoses, highlighting the high levels of comorbidity within this population. 

Emergency departments often become a key point of access to care for people experiencing homelessness. Barriers to primary care, difficulties registering with a GP and limited availability of community services can all contribute to reliance on emergency services. 

Geography also plays an important role. Rural and coastal areas tend to have fewer specialised services, limited public transport and greater distances between service providers. These factors can make it more difficult for people experiencing homelessness to access continuous support, increasing the likelihood of emergency care use. 

From a social care equity perspective, the study highlights how homelessness intersects with geographic disadvantage. People experiencing homelessness in rural and coastal areas may face additional barriers compared with those in urban areas, including limited service availability and hidden forms of homelessness. 

The findings suggest that improving coordination between health services, housing support and community organisations could help address these challenges. Integrated approaches that address housing, health and social needs together may reduce emergency department reliance and improve outcomes for this population. 

Key statistics 

Key messages 

Policy implications 

Gaps 

Commentary 
This study explores how geographical location and socioeconomic disadvantage shape access to palliative and end-of-life care in rural, coastal and low-income communities in southwest England. The South West Peninsula has one of the oldest populations in England, with more than a quarter of residents aged 65 or older. This ageing population increases the need for palliative care and community support services. 

People living in rural and coastal areas often face practical barriers to accessing care. Services may be located far from where people live, and public transport options can be limited. For people with serious illness or reduced mobility, travelling long distances for care can be particularly difficult. These barriers can delay access to support or make it harder for people to receive care in their preferred setting. 

Economic disadvantage can further increase these challenges. Some rural and coastal communities experience higher levels of deprivation alongside limited service availability. This combination can make it harder for individuals and families to access consistent and high-quality end-of-life care. 

The study highlights the value of working directly with local communities when planning services. Through partnerships between researchers, healthcare providers and community organisations, the project gathered insights into the specific needs and priorities of different communities. This approach helped identify gaps in services and possible ways to improve care delivery. 

From a care equity perspective, the findings show how location can shape access to health and social care services. People living in rural and coastal communities may experience structural barriers that are less common in urban areas. Without targeted policies and investment, these barriers can lead to inequities in access to palliative care and support at the end of life. 

Overall, the report suggests that improving palliative care access requires locally tailored solutions. Strengthening community services, improving transport and addressing workforce shortages could help ensure that people living in rural and coastal areas receive equitable support at the end of life.

Key messages 

Policy implications 

Gaps 

Commentary 
This parliamentary inquiry highlights the challenges faced by people living in rural communities when accessing health and social care services. Around 9.7 million people live in rural areas in England, many in small villages and isolated communities where services are more spread out. 

Distance is one of the main barriers. People in rural areas often have to travel further to reach hospitals, GP services or social care support. Public transport options are often limited, meaning access to care may depend on having a car or support from family members. These barriers can be particularly difficult for older people, people with disabilities and unpaid carers. 

Workforce shortages also contribute to care inequities in rural areas. Health and social care providers often find it harder to recruit and retain staff in rural locations. Staff may need to travel long distances between patients, and smaller local services may struggle to maintain stable teams. 

Funding arrangements can reinforce these inequities. Delivering services across large rural areas is often more expensive, but existing funding systems do not always account for these additional costs. As a result, services in rural areas may receive fewer resources relative to the challenges they face. 

Another issue highlighted in the report is that rural disadvantage is often less visible in national statistics. Because poverty and health needs are more dispersed across rural communities, they may not appear clearly in standard deprivation measures. This can make it harder for policymakers to identify where support is needed. 

Overall, the inquiry argues that addressing rural care inequities requires policies that recognise the specific challenges of rural areas. Improvements in funding, workforce support, transport and community-based services are needed to ensure that people living in rural communities can access health and social care on fair terms.